Amd Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-core Processor
Other reviews for that board put game framerate in the high 70s and 80s+ on that card at 1920x1080. Not that strange.McDohl - I misspoke earlier, other reviews mention that Sleeping Dogs is GPU heavy, not CPU heavy. Maintaining updated AMD Phenom X4 9550 software prevents crashes and maximizes hardware and system performance. Your motherboard may have a Gen 1 PCIE slot, or the Phenom 1 is just bottlenecking the card that badly. Source
bmacsysSep 15, 2014, 2:49 PM McDohl said: CraigN said: The first gen Phenoms were really quite awful in terms of performance. This is something around how the game is designed, and isn't something you can do a whole lot to get around. And your analogy is actually pretty good. It actually wiped the floor with mine, and they were playing at a significantly higher resolution (2560x1600) - mine was 1920x1080.Not to mention, I just swapped my 750ti back in and
Amd Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-core Processor
Language ▼ English Français Nederlands 日本語 Deutsch Español Italiano Português (EU) Português (BR) Dansk Cestina العربية 中文 (漢語) 中文 (汉语) Türkçe Русский Polski Svenska Norsk Suomi 한국말 हिन्दी Română Ελληνικά Magyar In fact a Athlon II or Phenom II will destroy your Phenom. My ram is neither maxing out. McDohlSep 16, 2014, 10:14 AM CraigN said: McDohl said: CraigN said: Bad console port.
I'm not the most hardware savvy, what am I missing here?You're right, regarding the 6300 I was going to take Microcenter up on a deal where I get a free Gigabyte Is the Phenom maxing out in Sleeping Dogs as well with the 750 Ti in? In regards to AC4, I was just reading that. Amd Phenom X4 9550 Review As a Gold Certified Independent Software Vendor (ISV), Solvusoft is able to provide the highest level of customer satisfaction through delivering top-level software and service solutions, which have been subject to
Using outdated or corrupt AMD Phenom X4 9550 drivers can cause system errors, crashes, and cause your computer or hardware to fail. Amd Phenom 9550 Benchmark I think it's a sound plan since you already own the card, the 750 Ti is a great budget card so selling it off to a friend or someone in need You'd be better off with your Option #2, if that's an option for you.http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/AMD+Phenom+X4+Processor+9550/review?_ga=1.237623235.279341893.1410811068Gives you an idea of relative performance of the 9550 to other CPUs.http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/AMD+FX-6300/reviewThe 6300 would probably work out http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Phenom%20X4%209550%20-%20HD9550WCJ4BGH%20(HD9550WCGHBOX).html Top 5 AMD Phenom X4 Drivers (15 Models) Phenom X4 9100e Processor | AMD | Phenom X4 Phenom X4 9150e Processor | AMD | Phenom X4 Phenom X4 9350e Processor |
Since it's DDR2, maybe it's a "quickness" thing regarding CL or timing?Here's a benchmark using Fire Strike: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4054907This was using the 9550 and the 270.Also, here are the setups I'm considering Amd Phenom X4 9550 Gaming To achieve a Gold competency level, Solvusoft goes through extensive independent analysis that looks for, amongst other qualities, a high level of software expertise, a successful customer service track record, and The 6300 will absolutely destroy a first generation Phenom. It's one of the better price/performance chips in AMD's lineup without making a hard swap to Intel, and will certainly not bottleneck your GPU if you decide to go up the
Amd Phenom 9550 Benchmark
McDohlSep 15, 2014, 3:01 PM CraigN said: This is partially correct, McDohl. http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Operating-Systems-and-Recovery/AMD-Phenom-X4-9550-Usage-Problem-with-Windows-7/td-p/154102 Guys with some serious setups were having issues with it, very strange. Amd Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-core Processor I'm glad I could help McDohl! Amd Phenom X4 9550 Compatible Motherboard Even if you got the FX6300, though, the FX6300 running at 40% capacity is still a *lot* better than the Phenom running at 40% capacity.
Also, you can probably get a set of 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz for like $70-75, so it's not too bad all things considered.That being said however, your Phenom 1 is still this contact form CraigNSep 15, 2014, 2:56 PM This is partially correct, McDohl. Even if you got the FX6300, though, the FX6300 running at 40% capacity is still a *lot* better than the Phenom running at 40% capacity. Is the Phenom maxing out in Sleeping Dogs as well with the 750 Ti in? Amd Phenom X4 9550 Overclock
Other reviews for that board put game framerate in the high 70s and 80s+ on that card at 1920x1080. Your motherboard may have a Gen 1 PCIE slot, or the Phenom 1 is just bottlenecking the card that badly. I'm very happy with this decision. have a peek here I checked and none are parked.
What do you think? X4 9550 Vs Q6600 This is closer to what you should be experiencing with that card, so my conclusion is if it's not the PCIE port (since you clearly have 2.0) and I'm assuming you're File Extensions Device Drivers File Troubleshooting Directory File Analysis Tool Errors Troubleshooting Directory Malware Troubleshooting Windows 8 Troubleshooting Guide Windows 10 Troubleshooting Guide Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Encyclopedia Windows Performance
Thanks for the swift reply.
How is the Gold Competency Level Attained? Each game manages CPU overhead differently. Not that strange.McDohl - I misspoke earlier, other reviews mention that Sleeping Dogs is GPU heavy, not CPU heavy. Amd Fx 9550 With that, you would assume those games aren't CPU intensive enough to require resources exceeding what the 9550 is providing.
solved Will my i3 6100 hold me back? The 6300 will be a noticeable performance bump on your system. I emphatically agree. Check This Out Here's a screenshot I just took of Sleeping Dogs (Max everything with Texture Pack): http://oi59.tinypic.com/23r9cz.jpgAs you can see, 99% of the GPU is being utilized (r9 270), while only a small
Also, you can probably get a set of 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz for like $70-75, so it's not too bad all things considered.That being said however, your Phenom 1 is still CraigNSep 15, 2014, 1:59 PM My only suggestion is to see if any of your cores are "parked." There are several Core Unpark apps out there that could help and see The 6300 will be a noticeable performance bump on your system. I see, that sucks.
Thanks for the swift reply. Access deniedThis IP address is blocked.We deny access to:Open proxiesAddresses within data center IP rangesAutomated requests and most types of botsVisitors that post spam in comments and/or forums, attempt to circumvent And yeah, there's even a few videos up, this one probably the most relevant to give you an idea:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDl2UGCOErYGuy is running Sleeping Dogs on an FX6300 with a GeForce 660 (The I'm getting significantly more stable framerates with the benefit of my whole system running better.The 7950's (Used) go for around $125-$140, not a bad price for what's actually a r9 280.
McDohlSep 16, 2014, 4:01 PM CraigN said: If your primary focus is gaming, I'd recommend regardless of what route you go to go ahead and get the FX6300.